GRA flagged for not selling seized vehicles to highest bidders

first_img…vehicle sold for $400,000 despite $1.8M competing bidWhile the Guyana Revenue Authority (GRA) can be proud of its increased tax collection for the 2018 fiscal year, the same cannot be said for the manner in which it has sold and disposed of seized vehicles.One of the vehicles seized by GRAIn the Auditor General’s 2018 Report, GRA was reported to have collected a total of $68.1 million from the sale of seized items for that year. Of all their seizures for 2018, the majority (38 per cent) was motor vehicles and spare parts.Almost immediately, the Audit Office reported having difficulties ascertaining what happened to six of 28 vehicles which were sold by way of tender in July 2018. It was found that two of the vehicles that were subject of the tender were found to be registered to two Government agencies rather than the highest bidder.According to GRA, however, four were sold and two were indeed assigned to the agencies. However, GRA noted that this was approved by the Commissioner-General, Godfrey Statia, something allowed by the Customs Act. The Audit Office, nevertheless, urged that they sell vehicles to ensure they maximise revenue.But more drama would follow the sale of vehicles. According to the report, the AG could not ascertain whether the bidders for 27 of a total of 71 vehicles honoured their obligations. GRA confirmed that indeed, 16 of the bidders did not honour their obligations.While some of the vehicles were eventually sold, some were again assigned to various departments. A worrying trend noted by the Auditor General concerns the vehicles being sold for rock bottom prices to various bidders.According to the AG, a Honda All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) was sold to someone who did not bid for the particular item but rather, made multiple purchases. This person rode away with a bargain, paying $161,000 for the ATV despite another bidder offering a sealed bid of $285,000.In another case, a vehicle was sold to someone for $400,000, despite the first bidder offering $1.8 million for the vehicle during a sealed bid exercise held in February 2019. The AG also noted that out of 34 vehicles that were supposed to be sold during the exercise, nine were removed at the request of the Commissioner-General.“However, no documentation to substantiate same was presented. Two were removed after publication of which 194 bids were received by intended purchasers, resulting in an estimated loss of revenue of $14.4 million,” the AG said, adding that his office could not determine if the bidders honoured their obligations through payments for the remaining 25 vehicles.In their defence, GRA stated that one motor vehicle was sold in accordance with the Customs Act, which, according to them, allows the Commissioner-General “to dispose of items in a manner as he may direct”.They also pled ignorance of the other vehicle referenced by the AG. In his recommendations, the AG repeated urgings that vehicles be disposed of with the view of maximising revenue and that all relevant documentation be presented for audit review.Last year, the parliamentary Opposition had actually approached the Guyana Police Force (GPF) to investigate fraud allegations at the GRA when it comes to seized vehicles. Specifically, the Opposition wanted to investigate how seized vehicles were finding their way onto the streets without being registered or gazetted.Opposition Leader Bharrat Jagdeo told reporters at one of his press conferences that hundreds of motor vehicles were being imported into Guyana and were not being placed on the register for Want of Entry and, therefore, were never gazetted and put up for auction. In fact, Jagdeo posited that these motor vehicles, most of which were luxury vehicles, were finding their way onto the streets.“The hundreds of luxury vehicles like Land Cruisers, Lexus, Hummers, BMW that came into the country were seized by GRA, never made it to the register for the Want of Entry and so were never gazetted and placed at the auctions.These hundreds of vehicles found their way into the hands of people sympathetic to the Government resulting in billions of dollars of lost revenue,” he had disclosed. For his part, Statia has denied any impropriety at his agency.last_img read more

MAN SENT FOR TRIAL ON FALSE IMPRISONMENT CHARGES

first_imgA Buncrana man has been accused of false imprisonment, assaulting causing harm and producing an article during a dispute.Letterkenny court.Brian McLaughlin, 21, appeared at Letterkenny District Court and was sent forward for trial at Letterkenny Circuit Court. McLaughlin, of St Oran’s Road, Buncrana, was served with a book of evidence.He was ordered to stay away from the injured party, stay out of Buncrana, remain sober and provide Gardai with a mobile phone number to be contacted on.He is also to stay at 2 Canal Road, Letterkenny.MAN SENT FOR TRIAL ON FALSE IMPRISONMENT CHARGES was last modified: June 23rd, 2014 by StephenShare this:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Tags:BRIAN MCLAUGHLINbuncranadonegalFalse Imprisonmentlast_img read more