January has been designated as National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month to better focus attention on this horrific crime and the exploited victims whose lives are forever changed.Many of our state and local politicians have been so very instrumental in co-sponsoring and/or supporting various bills which treat survivors of human trafficking as the victims they are, rather than as criminals. I would personally like to thank: Schenectady Mayor Gary McCarthy, City Councilman Ed Kosiur, state Sens. George A. Amedore and James Tedisco, Assemblymen Angelo Santabarbara and Phillip Steck, U.S. Sens. Kirstin Gillibrand and Chuck Schumer, and Rep. Paul Tonko. Since its inception in 1985, Safe Inc. of Schenectady, located at 1344 Albany St., has been at the forefront of providing emergency shelter and outreach services to more than 8,000 adolescents, teens and young adults.Its two highly regarded programs, Safe House — a co-ed youth shelter for homeless, runaway and other at-risk youth — and Project Safe, a continuum of services including counseling, health and wellness care, job training and life skills development (for ages 18-35), offer positive alternatives to street life where sexual exploitation and victimization are so rampant.Safe Inc. of Schenectady is the designee for New York state’s Safe Harbour initiative in Schenectady County. Safe Inc. of Schenectady has developed a collaborative task force, a community awareness campaign, provides case assessment referrals in collaboration with the County Multidisciplinary Team and Child Advocacy Center, refines interview strategies for the Department of Social Services and Safe Inc., and trains all staff in trauma-focused care.Barbara DworkinSchenectadyThe writer is board president of Safe Inc. of Schenectady.More from The Daily Gazette:Schenectady police reform sessions pivot to onlineSchenectady NAACP calls for school layoff freeze, reinstatement of positionsSchenectady department heads: Budget cutbacks would further stress already-stretched departmentsMotorcyclist injured in Thursday afternoon Schenectady crashEDITORIAL: Beware of voter intimidation Categories: Letters to the Editor, Opinion
Michael Elliss bought this southport house last year to develop the land. He didn’t want to demolish the historic home so offered it up for free. Picture Glenn HampsonA QUEENSLAND family has snapped up the historic Gold Coast home that was offered up for free.Brett McClelland and Rachael Webb have decided to take the Southport home, which they plan to move to their Canungra property and live in with their children.Mr McClelland said they were “over the moon” to have snapped up the one-bedroom, one bathroom 1930s brick and weatherboard house at 86 Johnston St.“The moment we walked in, we knew we needed this house,” he said.“It would be a shame if it was knocked down.”He said a friend of theirs worked at a company that could move the house for them but they still needed to get council approval, which could take months. The home belonged to Patricia Henricksen, who was born in the living room and lived there for most of her life. Picture Glenn Hampson“There will be a lot of work involved (and) there’s a lot of hurdles we’ve got to get through yet,” he said.More from news02:37International architect Desmond Brooks selling luxury beach villa16 hours ago02:37Gold Coast property: Sovereign Islands mega mansion hits market with $16m price tag2 days agoThe property was home to Patricia Henricksen from the day she was born in the living room in 1935 until it sold at auction last year.Michael Elliss and Cameron Reed of MCM Property Developments snapped it up for $880,000 with plans to build a three-storey unit block.They were reluctant to knock the existing house down but Ms Henricksen’s death earlier this year halted any thought of demolition. Ms Henricksen passed away last month. Picture Glenn HampsonLast month, Mr Elliss offered the home up to anyone who would love it as much as Ms Henricksen did for free as long as they could pay to relocate it, which would cost between $15,000 and $18,000.“I got so many inquiries, I just didn’t expect anything like that,” Mr Elliss said.When he opened the home for inspections, he asked visitors to write a message explaining what they would do to the house.He said Mr McClelland and Ms Webb explained they would restore it to its former glory, which showed they respected the old home.He offered it to them immediately.“I’m really happy,” he said.“It would have been good to keep it on the Coast but at the end of the day, they’re going to look after it.” The one-bedroom, one bathroom 1930s brick and weatherboard house at 86 Johnston St, Southport.
Image source: USACEThe Sandbridge Beach Restoration Project has been named by the American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA) as one of the beast restored beaches for 2017.This renourishment project is located in the city of Virginia Beach and has been re-nourished four times since 1998. An estimated 7.8 million cubic yards of sand have been placed on five miles of beach with a total cost of $43.8 million.“This project shows how a town, private landowners and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers can come together to protect houses; and that a community can find creative ways to fund their share of the project by creating a local tax district. The community could have armored the shoreline with higher seawalls and rip-rap, but choose instead to undertake a beach nourishment project to restore their beach,” ASBPA said in its release.The restored beach has increased the coastal resiliency of this shore while returning much needed sand to the littoral system.Prior to the restoration, there was no high-tide beach along this section of shoreline. The residents and the city proactively worked with the USACE to develop a federal project that not only restored the beach and dune ecosystem but dramatically reduced property damage and loss from severe storms.[mappress mapid=”24123″]
President of ISSA Dr Walton Small Old Boys Associations calls for audit of Association’s financial recordsThe Inter-secondary Schools Sports Association (ISSA) has come under intense scrutiny after an alliance of old boys’ associations of five prominent Jamaican high schools lodged a better complaint to the Ministry of Education about the operation of the school sporting body.The old boys’ associations of Calabar, Jamaica College, Kingston College, St. George’s College and Wolmer’s Boys’ School, submitted to the Ministry of Education, Youth & Information outlining a number of concerns.The letter dated June 2 was addressed to the Permanent Secretary, Deanroy Bernard, and copied to a number of individuals in various government ministries, including Education Minister Ruel Reid and Sports Minister Olivia Grange.The letter stated that the various associations have no confidence in ISSA’s desire to develop and protect student athletes and demanded an immediate forensic audit of ISSA’s financial records for the last five years.Dr. Walton Small, Principal of Wolmer’s Boys’ School, is the President of ISSA.Below is the letter addressed to the Ministry of Education, Youth & Information:As an alliance comprising the Old Boys Associations of Calabar High School, Jamaica College, Kingston College, St. George’s College and Wolmer’s Boys’ School, we hereby write to bring to your attention several concerns that we have in relation to the Inter-Secondary Schools Sports Association (ISSA).These concerns are primarily rooted in the grave lack of transparency, accountability and governance in how ISSA conducts its operations as well as the exploitative nature of aspects of ISSA’s handling of student athletes. We have approached ISSA through their president in the past and have found their response to be quite dismissive.ISSA has always been described by its Executive as a non-profit organization, and they have repeatedly insinuated that a large portion of the funds that they generate and collect are given back to the schools that participate in their events.An aerial view of the National Stadium during Boys and Girls Champs 2015We find these assertions difficult to reconcile with the fact that our research indicates that ISSA currently receives in excess of Two Hundred Million Dollars ($200 M) per annum from corporate sponsors alone, yet its total contribution to one of the leading participating schools for last year was under a million dollars.The members of the ISSA Executive have also described their positions as being voluntary in nature. However, we have been reliably informed that this is far from reality.It is our understanding that Executive Members do indeed receive monetary payments from ISSA, in addition to the Association paying for their foreign travel and accommodations when they represent and act – sometimes only putatively – on behalf of ISSA.It has also come to our attention that some members of the ISSA Executive are Directors of Greenfield Media Productions Ltd. (GMPL), a joint venture between ISSA and Grace Kennedy, the major sponsor of Boys and Girls Championships.Student athletes are the products from whom ISSA ultimately derives its income; these students sacrifice class time to compete in ISSA’s competitions, while placing themselves at risk of injury in the process.Action from the Manning CupIt is for these reasons that many of these athletes are in dire need of far more remedial classes and critical emergency medical care. However, it is past students and the respective alumni associations like ours that, largely, fund these crucial needs. It would appear that ISSA has taken a decision to resile from contributing in these areas. Accordingly, we have little confidence in ISSA’s desire or ability to develop and protect our student athletes.Furthermore, very little information on ISSA is made available to the public and attempts by alumni associations such as ours to access even basic documentation about that entity quite often run into roadblocks.Meanwhile, ISSA’s accountability/reporting framework remains unclear to us. It is not clear to whom ISSA reports in the Government bureaucracy, or whether it is currently being made to report to anyone at all. What does seem more apparent is that this body is operating without any robust governance structure, without properly established checks and balances, or guidelines for sound oversight.As an entity that coordinates and hosts sporting activities for secondary schools that are funded from the Consolidated Fund, we believe that ISSA, too, should be subjected to the Corporate Governance Framework for Public Sector Bodies of Jamaica.This is a major area of concern as our Old Boys’ associations have always been significant stakeholders in the development of our schools, and our efforts have borne fruit in many ways, including improved academic performance and sporting excellence.Our associations contribute to the welfare and learning of current students through scholarships, mentoring, feeding programmes, etc.Millions of dollars are spent annually on medical bills, physiotherapy, nutrition and hydration, feeding programmes, training camps and athletic equipment and gear.The harsh reality is that these costs are borne by the alumnae of each institution. A rough estimate puts the yearly expenditure of each school on its athletic programme above that of any single sponsorship package we have heard announced. In essence, this makes Calabar, JC, Wolmer’s, St George’s and KC, collectively, the largest financial contributor (read: sponsor) in making ISSA events successful. Yet, they refuse to even engage us in dialogue. (And, à la Shirley Chisholm, if they don’t give us a seat at the table, we are prepared to bring a folding chair!)In light of the above, we consider the following questions germane:1). Should ISSA be allowed to collect funds year after year without providing proper financial statements? Who is responsible for conducting financial and operational audits – if any – of ISSA? If audits have been done, when was the most recent one and are audit reports available for scrutiny? Does ISSA submit its accounting records, bank statements and audited financial statements to the Ministry of Education (MOE)?2). Should ISSA be allowed to keep large sums of money on fixed deposit, when many schools are having challenges meeting the requirements of participating in ISSA-run events because of financial constraints? Is the MOE or any other government ministry, agency or department keeping track of ISSA’s various current, savings and investment accounts?3). If many of the costs associated with the schools’ sporting programmes are already being borne by the schools, parents and alumni, shouldn’t ISSA have more funding available to remit to the schools?4). When one considers the fact that athletes have to sacrifice study time and classroom contact hours in order to put in the work required to achieve the world class standards of athletic performance at the annual Boys and Girls Athletics Championships, is it morally or ethically right for ISSA not to bear the burden of replacing these lost contact hours, especially when, for many of these athletes, they are unable to afford extra or remedial classes on their own?Shouldn’t ISSA have in place some sort of remedial summer or weekend-class program for example, to put back what the student athletes have lost in order to make the Championships the wildly profitable and internationally renowned event that it is?5). If the persons who comprise the ISSA Executive owe their places on that Executive solely to the fact that they are all employed to the MOE as principals of high schools, then should such persons be allowed to accrue financial gain from their participation in ISSA? Would such a situation not, almost inevitably, result in obvious conflicts of interest?6). Are ISSA Executive Members who sit on the board of Greenfield Media Production Ltd (GMP) receiving any direct financial benefits from that joint venture? Are they members of GMP in their individual capacity or as officers of ISSA? If they are, wouldn’t such a situation also result in further conflicts of interest?We are of the view that answers to the above questions will serve to enlighten the public on the potential for funding assistance and greater academic support for participating schools in future events.This financial aspect touches on the governance structure that ought to be required for a body such as ISSA, which impacts significantly the sporting performance and the development of athletes in Jamaica. Events such as the annual Boys & Girls’ Athletic Championships, the Manning Cup and DaCosta Cup football competitions are always of great national interest and importance.Accordingly, to address these issues we would like to respectfully recommend the following:1). An immediate forensic audit of ISSA’s financial records for the last five years be carried out and the findings made known. Particular scrutiny should be directed at payments and benefits that have been given to Executive Members.2). ISSA’s company documents, financial records and meeting records should be open and available to all key stakeholders (i.e., PTA, Alumni Associations, Coaches Association, MOE).3). Full financial and personal disclosure requirements for all ISSA Executive Members ought to become mandatory.4). Consideration should be given to diversifying the make-up of the ISSA Board to allow for representatives from the alumni associations, the Coaches Association, National Parent-Teacher Association of Jamaica (NPTAJ) and the MOE.5). Term limits for all ISSA Executive Members established and enforced based on guidelines for similar public funded bodies.6). Establishment of an oversight body for the ISSA, together with a clear and unambiguous reporting structure.7). Establishment of strict and transparent guidelines governing payments and remitting of funds to the participating schools.8). Consideration be given to setting restrictions on how ISSA may spend its net financial resources; specifically, this should be confined to direct reinvestment in the schools, especially in the area of student-athlete academic support.9). Promotion of greater probity and integrity in ISSA’s management and execution practices through random audits of ISSA sporting events.10). Conduct within ISSA be guided by a code of ethics, which would, inter alia, prohibit Executive Members from using their positions for personal financial gain.In light of the fact that all of current ISSA Executive Members are employees of Government-run schools who ought to submit Statutory Declaration of Assets, Liabilities & Income pursuant to the Corruption (Prevention) Act, and that the MOE has an obligation to the public to ensure that those in its employ conduct themselves in a manner that is always unquestionably above board, we are seeking your direct intervention in his matter.We anticipate receiving an acknowledgement and a timely response.